[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Aug 13 00:23:44 BST 2009


2009/8/13 Nop <ekkehart at gmx.de>:
>
> Hi!
>
> Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>> highway=footway (not suitable)
>>>>> bicycle=dedicated (signed)
>>>>
>>>> A footway for cycling is not a valid combination to me.
>>
>> why not? In Germany: sign footway + additional sign: "Fahrräder frei"
>
> That's yes, not designated.

Your mixing things up, that's path, here it was footway. What do you
mean by "signed"?

cheers,
Martin




More information about the talk mailing list