[OSM-talk] [Fwd: Re: Proliferation of path vs. footway]

[Pieren]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Roy Wallace<waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a
> bad thing???

If it is millions time the same thing, yes. Look another thread
speaking about TIGER import clean-up.

> Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority,
> but it IS a GOOD THING to have llama restrictions in the database.

Yes, it is. In PERU.

> The core issue here (that I believe we agree on) is that if tags have
> inconsistent implications, they must be made explicit.

Absolutely true: explicit in the wiki ;-)

Pieren