[OSM-talk] [RFC] Deprecating the use of Tag:highway=stop in favour of Key:stop
David Paleino
d.paleino at gmail.com
Mon Aug 24 23:00:13 BST 2009
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:32:46 +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
> Le lundi 24 août 2009 à 15:25, Lester Caine a écrit :
> > Adding an extra node does make sense, but probably needs a 'relation' to
> > the intersection as well? In any case the direction through this new
> > node is the critical piece of information? Tagging ways would require
> > that every section of a way is broken up. I'm thinking of some route
> > around here that have several intersections along them, many but not all
> > of which are compulsory stop along that single way. Simply adding nodes
> > on the correct side of each intersection would be somewhat easier to
> > implement, while currently these restrictions are not recorded.
>
> How about simply creating a relation with those two nodes?
>
> You have an intersection of two (or more) roads and when you come to that
> intersection from one particular road (in one particular direction) you have
> a stop. Then you add a node on that way before the intersection, then create
> a relation (let's say of type=stop, or any more self-explanatory value)
> where you have the stop node with role "stop_from" and the intersection with
> role "stop_at".
Sorry, this is useless. We could just use highway=stop and teach routing
software that they're valid only if coming from a certain direction, decided on
a distance-from-nearest-junction basis. This is what we're (I am, at least)
trying to avoid: arbitrary placement of real-world nodes -- if we all had
1cm-resolution GPS units, then we would just use highway=stop. IMHO, YMMV.
> Such a scheme can be easily interpreted as: when you pass over a node
> highway=stop that is a member of a relation type=stop with role stop_from,
> then you must stop at the node of that relation that has the role stop_to.
No, you must NOT. In this case, you would stop in the middle of the
intersection. A stop signal instructs you to stop *before* the intersection. :)
Kindly,
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090825/f066b856/attachment.pgp>
More information about the talk
mailing list