[OSM-talk] [RFC] Deprecating the use of Tag:highway=stop in favour of Key:stop
Joseph Booker
joe at neoturbine.net
Tue Aug 25 15:32:00 BST 2009
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:06:19 +0200
Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Roy Wallace<waldo000000 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 1) a relation with the node and the way as members, as in,
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop)
> > 2) the way tagged with indirect reference to the node (i.e. start or
> > end node of way) - as in,
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stop 3) an extra node
> > tagged, placed on the way, "near" the intersection (Pieren's email)
> >
> > I prefer 1) for a number of reasons. IMHO, 2) and 3) are more or
> > less attempts to mimic 1) in order to avoid using a relation.
>
> A small pic is better than a long speach. One example with one major
> street and six minor streets all having stops when intersecting with
> the major street:
> |
> ---+---
> |
> ---+---
> |
> ---+---
> |
> 1) add 6 relations + minor streets split
> 2) add 6 different tags "stop=yes/both/-1" + minor streets split
> 3) add 6 nodes on the minor streets themselves and closed to the
> intersections and all tagged with "highway=stop"
>
> All solutions are valid but 3) makes contributor's life easier.
> Pieren
According to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop ,
it seems like you would just have 3 relations. The first relation would
include the node for the top intersection and the two streets with the
stop signs.
I didn't consider 3), but it doesn't seem right to have an approach
that requires stop signs to be tagged separately from the intersection
(see my other email).
Somewhat off topic, but what about expanding the stop relation proposal
to handle traffic signals, yield signs, and whatever else is
appropriate? (with highway=stop or highway=traffic_signals allowed for
nodes where all the ways coming in are restricted by the stop or
lights).
--
Joseph Booker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090825/efba2072/attachment.pgp>
More information about the talk
mailing list