[OSM-talk] New proposal: Bad data

[John Smith]

--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Jukka Rahkonen <jukka.rahkonen at mmmtike.fi> wrote:

> Instead of calling it Bad data I would say it inaccurate or
> outdated data. Map
> data traced from Yahoo imagery is better than no data at
> all. But some common
> schema for tagging the quality of mapped features would be
> useful. Or is there
> already some, in addition to using FIXME and source tags?

Anything tagged source=yahoo* or source=landsat should be treated worst than source=survey and people should source the data properly otherwise others will assume the data was traced if hi-res imagery is available.