[OSM-talk] New proposal: Bad data

[Elizabeth Dodd]

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
> --- On Wed, 26/8/09, Liz <edodd at billiau.net> wrote:
> > could we simply extend source=survey with a year
> > and source=landsat similarly?
> >
> > source=survey09
> > source=landsat_trace09
> > source=yahoo_trace08
>
> I'd seperate the information out into 2 key pairs:
>
> source=survey
> survey_date=20090826
>
> or
>
> source=yahoo
> imagery_date=20070101
>
> or just source:date=*



some places i have been over so many times (like the road to canberra, the 
roads to adelaide, and the road to work) that the actual date is meaningless, 
but the last year i did the journey is
we also can't date the satellite imagery accurately.
for example
landsat is supposedly the 7 year old set, but it is about 10 years old at 
home, judging from the dates of new housing estates