[OSM-talk] waterway=lock
Mike Harris
mikh43 at googlemail.com
Thu Aug 27 14:27:01 BST 2009
Jack
I have tried various systems for this one. At present I favour tagging two
nodes - one for each gate (or multiples of 2 for complex locks e.g. Vale
Royal where there are two parallel locks, each with - of course - two
gates), isolating the section of canal between and giving this the tags
name= and ref= . I have no strong opinion - beyond wishing to record the
name and number of the lock - and would be interested in other views. Not
keen on using name_1 - prefer the ref= tag.
Not quite clear whether you add identical name= and ref= to each of the two
gates?
On a related canal issue, I have a problem with deciding how to tag a canal
bridge as a segment of a way. The way will often already have name= and ref=
tags as a highway; but I want to add a name= and ref= tag for the canal
bridge. Not keen on name_1 or ref_1 - any better ideas? I did wonder about
adding a node in the middle of the bridge and then tagging this with the
canal bridge information and reserving the name and ref tags for the highway
segment.
Mike Harris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Stringer [mailto:jack.ixion at googlemail.com]
> Sent: 27 August 2009 12:14
> To: Talk Openstreetmap
> Subject: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock
>
> Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
>
> What is the preferred way to record the information?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
> Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just
> to use name.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lock
> Says to tag either both ends or just use a single node.
>
> Problem I see is that there are 2 ways to name a lock and 2
> ways to indicate one exists.
>
> For example,
> waterway=lock_gate
> name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>
> or
>
> lock=yes
> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>
> I have then seen people use name_1=5 to tell you the lock number.
>
> I would suggest,
> waterway=lock_gate
> name=Withrington Bottom Lock
> ref=5
>
> Discuss...
>
>
>
> Jack Stringer
>
>
>
More information about the talk
mailing list