[OSM-talk] Good routing vs legal routing (was: Path vs footway vs cycleway vs...)
Roy Wallace
waldo000000 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 22:29:20 GMT 2009
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/12/1 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
>>
>> And then both axes are not really "boolean". Between the physically
>> possible and the physically impossible may lie an area that requires
>> more skill, better vehicles or simply means a higher risk of accidents.
>
> amenity=footway, surface=wire, risk=very_high?
> http://staalplaat.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/philippe-petit-wtc-tightrope2.jpg
risk=very_high isn't verifiable. Just in case you were serious :P
More information about the talk
mailing list