[OSM-talk] OSMF: The people you are going to hand over your OSM data ...
Liz
edodd at billiau.net
Sat Dec 5 23:38:08 GMT 2009
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just reading:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Why_You_Should_Vote_Ye
>s
>
>
> Where user Steve added:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> What about the 'no' page?
>
> It's mainly full of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) and is marked as
> inaccurate. There are discussion on those problems on the Why You Should
> Vote No talk page.
>
> Please be aware that any open source project has a wide range of
> opinions, and you will find some of the more bizarre and extreme on the
> 'No' page. That doesn't represent a consensus but the disruptive work of
> a few disaffected people getting hot headed.
>
> -- This unsigned comment was added by User:Steve 21:34, 5 December 2009
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Remember: Steve is the head of the OSMF, so this is the OSMF Chairman's
> position about other peoples opinions when they don't share his own
> opinion.
>
> Is this the organization you want to hand over the license of your OSM
> data?
>
> Regards, ULFL
>
SteveC marked the NO page as in dispute. No, he didn't mark the YES page as in
dispute.
If there was no dispute there would be no need for a vote.
I find the graffiti on the NO page very disturbing. It is intended as a
statement page by those who differ, and those who want to put positive
comments on the new licence should use their own page.
Liz
More information about the talk
mailing list