[OSM-talk] [Announce] OSMF license change vote has started

[Ulf Lamping]

SteveC schrieb:
> 
> 
> Yours &c.
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:29, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ian.dees at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, SteveC < 
>> <mailto:steve at asklater.com>steve at asklater.com 
>> <mailto:steve at asklater.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:15, Ulf Lamping <
>>     <mailto:ulf.lamping at googlemail.com>ulf.lamping at googlemail.com
>>     <mailto:ulf.lamping at googlemail.com>>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>     > St<eveC schrieb:
>>     >> On Dec 5, 2009, at 19:40, John Smith <
>>     <mailto:deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>>
>>     >> wrote:
>>     >>> 2009/12/6 SteveC <
>>     <mailto:steve at asklater.com>steve at asklater.com
>>     <mailto:steve at asklater.com>>:
>>     >>>> By letting them know FUD and BS will be shot down.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> And you are coming off just as unrational as you are claiming they
>>     >>> are
>>     >>> being and not helping fence sitters one bit.
>>     >> Read the wikipedia entry on tit for tat, and iterated prisoners
>>     >> dilemma.
>>     >
>>     > Ok, I did and now?
>>
>>     I don have the patience, matt can you explain?
>>
>>
>> Seriously?
>>
>> I respect both of your opinions, but please take your personal pissing 
>> match off-list.  ... at least flame about the topic on hand.
> 
> I'm not flaming, totally cool. I just honestly don't have the time to 
> explain game theory to someone being obtuse.

Personally, I don't feel to comment on this ...