[OSM-talk] [talk-au] Fwd: Re: Why PD is not better for business
Brendan Morley
morb.gis at beagle.com.au
Sat Dec 12 14:12:17 GMT 2009
I just assumed street maps was its original purpose that it outgrew as it became more popular.
However, there's great value in having "everything with a position on the Earth" in the one true geofabric. Assuming the OSMF is happy to have the
database be populated with said objects.
I'm sure you can still run up a stylesheet that just shows streets if you want. (-:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:30:15 +0000, Dave F. wrote:
>paul youlten wrote:
>> But it is still a street map that we are making - administrative
>> boundaries, top secret government installations, Al Qaeda training
>> camps, water catchment areas and so on are fascinating (and probably
>> great fun to map) but they are not necessarily part of a street map.
>>
>> PY
>>
>>
>Paul
>I think you have a slightly narrow perspective of OSM.
>Yes, it has street in the title & yes, it says "/such as street maps"
>/in the tag line, but it doesn't say 'only' street maps.
>Do you think parks, pubs, recycling centres etc shouldn't be mapped?
>If it's a physical entity then it can be mapped.
>Cheers
>Dave F.
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20091213/01fdb5dc/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list