[OSM-talk] What's the policy on unsurveyed roads from imagery?
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Mon Dec 28 00:13:06 GMT 2009
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Elizabeth Dodd <edodd at billiau.net> wrote:
> We want to avoid roads with too much traffic.
> None of these maps are going to check for hills
> It doesn't matter whose definition of primary/secondary/tertiary
> because the object is ride on the lower grade roads having sent all the
> motorised traffic on the higher grade roads :)
>
Obviously with the exception of roads with dedicated bike lanes, which
presumably should be mapped separately, but in most cases probably aren't.
Okay, I stand corrected. I guess some bicyclists do use
primary/secondary/tertiary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20091227/299ca5f0/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list