[OSM-talk] Keep Mapnik relevant
grand.edgemaster at gmail.com
Wed Jan 7 21:30:09 GMT 2009
2009/1/7 Matthias Julius <lists at julius-net.net>:
> If historic data is within the scope of OSM then it surely is not only
> of interest for railways. Therefore a generic way of tagging should
> be used that can apply to any object. Maybe removed=yes|<date>
But then we get into the messy situation of not being able to read off
a single tag to decide what type of feature something is.
Not all data clients are likely to implement a tag that means the
logical opposite of the existence of a feature.
More information about the talk