[OSM-talk] AAAA openstreetmap still doesn't use ipv6
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Jul 1 23:34:28 BST 2009
Hi,
Claudius wrote:
> There are not enough IPv4 adresses for Africa and Latin America already
> which is why they are assigning IPv6 only already. Now with the new east
> african internet cable this might lead to even more IPv6 users in
> potential OSM countries, but... all those IPv6 users cannot reach IPv4
> only servers.
This is an honest question because I really have not researched the
matter: Are there *real* people in developing countries whom one might
consider potential mappers who buy Internet access and get IPv6 only
with no HTTP access to IPv4 only servers? Would not any provider who
cannot offer IPV4 addresses be forced to set up easy-to-use proxy or
masquerading systems?
(Can they even reach ebay, amazon, cnn, twitter and the lot then?)
Or is this something rather hypothetical, much like it would
theoretically be possible to set up an IPv6-only dialup in Germany if
you really, really wanted?
I'm trying to find out if IPv6 is something that is pragmatically
required, or if this is rather something ideology-based - I read a lot
of "should" in Thomas's statements. My opinion is that if we have reason
to believe that, for the forseeable future, even those IPv6-only
machines that might exist somewhere will have an effortless way to
connect to the IPv4 world (and the only thing to be said against this is
that it is "technically uncool"), then I would not waste a minute trying
to be cool. But if there are real-world situations where people who can
use the rest of the internet normally turn away from OSM because we
don't talk to them, then we should act.
It is probably a moot point anyway because, as someone else pointed out,
either UCL does it or they don't and we would be the last ones to raise
a fuss with them over anything.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list