[OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable?

[Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)]

Simon,

I think you probably should be emailing this to CM. So have done so for you.

Cheers

Andy

>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of simon at mungewell.org
>Sent: 02 July 2009 12:54 AM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable?
>
>I had a little play with Cloudmade's routing stuff and it wasn't quite
>working for me.....
>
>http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=51.103306&lng=-
>114.079413&zoom=15&directions=51.10050375773113,-
>114.0750789642334,51.10594712658125,-
>114.08280372619629&travel=foot&styleId=3697
>
>Both foot and cycle routes take a long way around (car goes even further
>thought an 'access=bus' section).
>
>How often is the route database updated? Cycle way through path was last
>edited around the 19th June, but is not used in the route.
>
>Also in realality the park is also routeable, one could just walk up
>Trafford Ave and over a bit of grass. Is it possible to tag so this can
>happen?
>
>
>
>And on this one, it routes the bike slightly further:
>http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=51.118516&lng=-
>114.048493&zoom=16&directions=51.11576782135306,-
>114.04864311218262,51.12080533765644,-
>114.04978036880493&travel=bicycle&styleId=1714
>
>If the start/end points are moved slightly it permits foot/cycles to go
>both ways so it's not a tagging thing. What's going on?
>
>Cheers,
>Mungewell.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk