[OSM-talk] Circular relation by user mapper_07

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Wed Jul 15 23:51:53 BST 2009


Hi,

Shaun McDonald wrote:
> Yes you can do it, though I don't have a good reason for doing such a 
> thing.

I don't have an idea where one would add a relation as a member to 
itself, but circular references could e.g. happen if you were to create 
a relation for a city and then have another city as a member with 
role="twinned_with" - this would obviously be circular.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"




More information about the talk mailing list