[OSM-talk] Circular relation by user mapper_07
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Jul 15 23:51:53 BST 2009
Hi,
Shaun McDonald wrote:
> Yes you can do it, though I don't have a good reason for doing such a
> thing.
I don't have an idea where one would add a relation as a member to
itself, but circular references could e.g. happen if you were to create
a relation for a city and then have another city as a member with
role="twinned_with" - this would obviously be circular.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list