[OSM-talk] keep right! and landuse=wood
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Mon Jul 20 14:35:09 BST 2009
John Smith wrote:
>
>
> --- On Mon, 20/7/09, David Earl <david at frankieandshadow.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed, in most developed countries, I would suggest that it is
>> very rare for trees to be naturally occurring or not managed in
>> some way.
>
> I've no idea about most developed countries, but I'm confident that
> not all of Australia has been logged or managed, and I wouldn't be
> surprised if some parts of Canada haven't been logged or managed
> either.
And I bet these would be tagged as "forest" by most people (because they
are big and called things like "Wombat Forest").
Don't you think there is an absurdity in
landuse=forest
name=Oak Wood
(area < 1 hectare)
and
natural=wood
name=Amazon Rain Forest
(area > 10000 sq km)
Now, I would tag it that way if that was the "spec", but there is no
spec for OSM, so as I said I suspect most people do what "feels" right
rather than try to determine the tagging according to some usually
undeterminable criterion of "naturalness".
David
More information about the talk
mailing list