[OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natural world mapping ...

[Gustav Foseid]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> wrote:

> Surely the basic, universal need is "there are some trees here, they're
> called Sherwood Forest"? Evoke natural=wood (lakes and beaches also fall in
> between managed and unmanaged land but are marked as natural)


"Some trees here" called something, does not really fit the reality in all
places.

Scandinavia:
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=60.632796,13.771362&spn=1.470943,5.844727&t=h&z=8

Siberia:
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=62.277187,62.466202&spn=0.174406,0.730591&t=h&z=11

Amazonas:
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=-6.20609,-62.402344&spn=5.960723,11.689453&t=h&z=7

Kongo:
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=0.911827,16.798096&spn=2.998546,5.844727&t=h&z=8

 - Gustav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090720/8a067e04/attachment.html>