[OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natural world mapping ...

Gustav Foseid gustavf at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 19:33:41 BST 2009


On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:10 PM, David Lynch <djlynch at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm also thinking that deprecating both landuse=forest and
> natural=wood might be a good idea if this goes forward. Replace it
> with natural=trees, which is just as self-explanitory, and which (to
> this particular mapper) sounds like a better fit for small clumps of
> <10 trees than "wood."


What would you then use for a 200 square kilometer continous forest?

 - Gustav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090720/34a0de3a/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list