[OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natural world mapping ...
Gustav Foseid
gustavf at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 19:33:41 BST 2009
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:10 PM, David Lynch <djlynch at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm also thinking that deprecating both landuse=forest and
> natural=wood might be a good idea if this goes forward. Replace it
> with natural=trees, which is just as self-explanitory, and which (to
> this particular mapper) sounds like a better fit for small clumps of
> <10 trees than "wood."
What would you then use for a 200 square kilometer continous forest?
- Gustav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090720/34a0de3a/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list