[OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natural world mapping ...

[Tom Chance]

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:37:32 +1000, Liz <edodd at billiau.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Alice Kaerast wrote:
>> There is also another property which hasn't been considered - type of
>> trees.  Evergreen vs. Deciduous might be nice to know.  Ordnance survey
>> maps differentiate between coniferous and non-coniferous and has
>> symbols for coppice and orchard.
> 
> Another Venn diagram problem.
> Our trees are neither coniferous or deciduous, and the alternate is
"mixed"

(not knowing a great deal about tree classification)

Can we not just add other values for wood= to allow nice little tiling
icons for other tree types?

Tom