[OSM-talk] Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2009/7/26 Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com>:
> info is pretty old and not up to date.

well, but it is still valid, even if it's old, isn't it? I could not
find errors - things that now are treated/mapped differently or the
like.

> some rework is needed to make it
> really useful.

go ahead. I think it is already of some use, and would be much more if
there wasn't a disclaimer on top stating that the information is old
and wrong.

> Include newer standards like relations,

yes, but that's additions (and they are not the most important thing
in the beginning, also they are already documented on other pages,
maybe a link would be sufficient).

> remove some lengthy
> explanations about divided highways. remove or shrink some of the large
> pictures to make it easier to read.

but that's esthetics and not out-of-date. If there is no more, I will
remove the disclaimer.

cheers,
Martin