--- On Mon, 27/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> but be careful not to break things up. Maxheight could be
> valid for
> the way on the bridge itself as well.
Yup, the height is someone's attempt to do maxheight, not mapping the clearance or height of the bridge...
In this case height=2.9m :)