[OSM-talk] maxheight/height

Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skippern at gimnechiske.org
Tue Jul 28 09:27:52 BST 2009


On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:25:34 +0200, <marcus.wolschon at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:22:54 +0200, "Aun Johnsen (via Webmail)"
> <skippern at gimnechiske.org> wrote:
>> I do not agree that they bouth should be treated as maxheight=* If my
car
>> with load that is 3m high, and maxheight=3m, but physical clearance is
> much
>> higher,than you would pass at the speed limit, but if both maxheight and
>> physical clearance is 3m, than I would need to slow down to almost crawl
>> when passing the lowest point. maxheight can be 3m even if physical
>> clearnance is 3.2m
> 
> 
> I am not using maxheight in any of the metrics
> that involve a travel-time to optimize for so
> it has no effect on the route other then allowing
> or disallowing that path at all.
> Thus at least for me it makes no difference.
> 
> Marcus
It makes no difference for your routing software, but maybe I will make a
routing software with that option?
-- 
Brgds
Aun Johnsen
via Webmail




More information about the talk mailing list