[OSM-talk] [talk-au] maxheight/height

Roy Wallace waldo000000 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 09:26:25 BST 2009


On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Mark Williams
<mark.666 at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Therefore maxheight is a property of the way going under the bridge,
> possibly >1 way if the road is fragmented in OSM, and ought to be on the
> whole road from where the sign is until after the bridge.

Yup, that seems to be the consensus. And when there is no sign? I
would suggest tagging only the part of the way that is physically
restricted, i.e. physically under the bridge.




More information about the talk mailing list