[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2009/7/30 John Smith <delta_foxtrot at yahoo.com>:
> So why not just use maxheight=* and maxheight:legal=* ?

actually even though the definition in the wiki might not specify it
unambigously and explicitly the current use of maxheight (as discussed
intensively at least on German ML) should be maxheight:legal, so I
would encourage to put it the other way round:
maxheight
and
maxheight:physical

This view is also encouraged by the depicted sign on the feature-definition:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/Zeichen_265.svg/200px-Zeichen_265.svg.png
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight

cheers,
Martin