[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[John Smith]

--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) <skippern at gimnechiske.org> wrote:
> No, you can only ASSUME that the current maxheight only use
> the legal form.
> Have you counted usages in countries where the physical
> maxheight are
> signed? Do you even know which countries such signs are
> available? Without
> any statistics, you cannot know.

Even if it does mean physical height any existing tags would need to be updated if it doesn't mean legal max height so I see no problem clarifying the fact the maxheight is the legal meaning, and maxheight:physical is for the physical clearance, if both are signed.