[OSM-talk] more OSM coming soon

Apollinaris Schoell aschoell at gmail.com
Thu Jun 18 22:42:16 BST 2009


had the same troubles in firefox at some point. some tiles loaded some
didn't. other browser worked so it was clearly not server problem

Check the Content -> Load images automatically settings, this solved my
troubles

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Ivo van den Maagdenberg <
ivo.vdmaagdenberg at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 2009/5/13 Jon Burgess <jburgess777 at googlemail.com>
>
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 22:12 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> > 2009/5/13 Ivo van den Maagdenberg <ivo.vdmaagdenberg at gmail.com>:
>> > > Hi Folks,
>> > >
>> > > This is some sort of quality of service question. Half of all the
>> tiles on
>> > > http://www.openstreetmap.org render as 'more OSM coming soon'. I want
>> to
>> > > know if I am doing something wrong (Ubuntu 8.10 + firefox 3.0 +
>> reasonable
>> > > hardware)
>> >
>> > The tiles display this in the case of network troubles where the
>> > server isn't reachable, they're also displayed if the tile hasn't yet
>> > been rendered (and is present on the server's disk) and when it's not
>> > possible to render on the fly. Otherwise, the tile is added to the
>> > render queue and should be available at some point shortly in the
>> > future.
>> >
>> > > Showing OSM to a friend that has not seen 'the Map' does not give a
>> good
>> > > impression this way. A solution is to implement some sort of double
>> > > buffering where the old tiles are kept for display until the new one
>> has
>> > > properly rendered? Well, that's maybe impossible, but it would improve
>> the
>> > > responsiveness of the http://www.openstreetmap.org at the moment.
>> >
>> > I believe this is already the case.
>>
>> There is a cache of tiles which is used when the rendering can not keep
>> up. The weekly planet import is running at the moment and I have
>> temporarily turned of the re-rendering of tiles so you will only seeing
>> tiles from the cache right now.
>>
>> I'm in the middle of making some updates to the server to migrate the
>> cached tiles and rendering database to an external disk array which will
>> speed things up quite a bit. All the old tiles should still be
>> available, but the live rendering probably won't restart until some time
>> tomorrow.
>>
>
> Strange thing, after a month things seem not to have improved much on the
> frontpage for openstreetmap, with respect to the number of tiles being
> rendered at a fairly reasonable place and zoom-level like:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.91&lon=-0.23&zoom=7&layers=B000FTF
>
> In my browser it currently shows 4 out of 12 renderd tiles "... more OSM
> coming soon". As mentioned before, I would like to raise some concern to
> have at least rendered tiles available at all times. Especially now, it
> seems things are broken to a noticable extent.
>
> Is there something to do about this? Maybe not flush previous rendered
> tiles until they are actually rerenderd on an another disklocation and when
> the new tile is ready, copy it over the old tile to keep the update fairly
> unnoticable. Then again, I am just guessing how the rendering takes place,
> so this approach might be totally unpractical.
>
> Looking trough the openlayer code reference by the map page, the tiles seem
> to come from
>
> var noname = new OpenLayers.Layer.OSM("NoName", [
>       "http://a.tile.cloudmade.com/" + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>       "http://b.tile.cloudmade.com/" + nonamekey + "/3/256/",
>
>       "http://c.tile.cloudmade.com/" + nonamekey + "/3/256/"
>
>
> Maybe there is a known bottleneck in infrastructure that makes the tiles fail to be rendered?
>
> Bye, Ivom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090618/1167bb19/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list