[OSM-talk] Proposed Amenity Reorganization
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Wed Jun 24 10:36:26 BST 2009
On 24/06/2009 00:43, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gregory at arenius.com wrote:
>> What do people think?
>
> I think "why bother". Clearly what we have is chaotic, but any system
> you can think of will become chaotic sooner or later with people
> (ab)using it to their heart's content, so what's the big deal.
+1
If you're not sure what something comes under it's easy enough to look
it up, and in most cases presets know about it anyway.
Personally I think these categorizations have no value anyway, and if I
were designing it from scratch, I'd have just a type for each item and
properties which are the tags. But I'm not, and like the many proposals
that surface on this list to "rearrange everything", it may be a bit
neater but it is too much of an upheaval for the minimal gain.
It's not as if these are any more than internal identifiers.
David
More information about the talk
mailing list