[OSM-talk] License plan

[OJ W]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> 2. People who don't like ODbL and withdraw their data. _Assuming_ we can get
> the bugs sorted in ODbL, and we can't take that for granted yet, this
> percentage should be very small.

except that the ODbL does represent a fundamental change in licensing
of map images - previously they were sharealike, but with ODbL it will
only require attribution?

This could potentially alienate anyone who wonders why they are doing
surveying for free so that cartographers can sell all-rights-reserved
map images based on their data.