[OSM-talk] licence plan - Question about supplying own data

[Iván Sánchez Ortega]

El Miércoles, 4 de Marzo de 2009, Jason Cunningham escribió:
> 2. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_Licence/Use_Cases
> "*Section 4.3 also requires that the notice include information regarding
> where the user can obtain a copy of the Database or Derivative Database.*"

Please read about the DFSG tests:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guidelines#debian-legal_tests_for_DFSG_compliance

The aim of the ODbL, as well as any other share-alike license, is to comply 
with that. You only have to make available the source, *if* you make 
available the work at all, only to the people you distribute the work to.


P.D.: This should go in legal@
P.P.D.: Read my rants in another thread about having to reply to this kind of 
questions all over again.

-- 
----------------------------------
Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivan at sanchezortega.es>

Proudly running Debian Linux with 2.6.26-1-amd64 kernel, KDE 3.5.10, and PHP 
5.2.6-3 generating this signature.
Uptime: 16:13:52 up 12 days, 20:53,  1 user,  load average: 0.33, 0.48, 0.36
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090304/f65fd27c/attachment.pgp>