[OSM-talk] Post tastsic questions of my own
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Mar 5 08:55:39 GMT 2009
Steve,
(Has someone told you that you're overly concerned about your Fake self?
He seems to make an appearance in every second post you write.)
SteveC wrote:
> Over IM and email I've had some really positive replies. There are a
> lot of you out there who personally responded that you liked my posts.
"Lurkers support me in E-Mail!"
I know how it feels only I seem to get the E-Mails of those who are
unhappy ;-) the tone of these E-Mails is usually: "I think the whole
process stinks but I am not with the project long enough to feel
entitled to say so publicly." - My answer is usually along the lines
"anyone is entitled to speak their mind so feel free to do so; yes the
process stinks but I think that it is worth trying to fix things instead
of rejecting the relicensing effort outright. Sometimes good things are
delivered in ugly wrapping".
> You don't like the crappy negative tone of a lot of people. You think
> the license is a good step. You want to see my satanic portal. I have
> to ask you why do you do this personally? I know the answer. You have
> a secret and you want to keep it safe and warm and snuggly in your
> duvet, away from these posts. It's called sanity. I know. It's hard.
> But if you post here, and show the End Of The World crew that there
> are opinions beyond.... we will all be better. Really.
These mailing lists are for communication, for talking to each other and
finding solutions. I am not interested in "me too" postings from people
who don't care enough to engage in discussion - from either side of
the argument. (Is there "either side"? Personally I feel that I'm on all
sides at the same time. Or on none of them, depending on your point of
view.) Someone who is unwilling to defend and argue for his opinion is
not a worthy addition to any kind of debate. This is not a "whose fanboy
are you" poll.
And before you say that there is more mud-slinging than debate: We had a
lot of very sensible debate over on legal-talk; that would have taken us
even further had you or someone else from the "licensing working group"
participated in it rather than ignoring it.
> My second question goes to those who live in the various countries
> that aren't bankrupt... oh I mean those that aren't in the UK. How is
> the community there? Is it bad? Is it good? How can we help. What are
> *you* doing to help? Are you stirring dissent? Are you trying to build
> a consensus?
My view of the community in Germany is that dissent stirs itself, with
the major themes being:
(1) fear for loss of data because people will not agree to the change -
it seems to me that even more so than on the English-language lists,
Germans are so protective of the OSM they have helped create that they'd
rather keep a crappy and non-working license than to have to delete data.
(2) unhappiness about lack of protection for Produced Works,
envious/greedy arguments about possible commercial exploitation of same,
and unwillingness to accept interim database share-alike as a replacement
(3) general unease about the process (feeling left out/rushed; having
been told in the past that the OSMF does not want to influence the fate
of the project, just operate servers and collect money; generally not
having had any say in the new license and a feeling that is unlikely
they will ever have a say because the license is being designed by
lawyers from another country in another language etc.
I'm generally defending the benefits of the new license, subject to the
caveats being discussed here; however it is my opinion that the process
how we got to where we are now has been wrong and if someone seeks
reassurance from me ("please tell me that they will listen to our
concerns and not try to rush everyone into accepting a new license while
important issues are unsolved, please tell me that they won't do funny
things behind closed doors, please tell me that we will get a profound
legal opinion before they go ahead, please tell me that I won't wake up
one morning to find an E-Mail in my inbox saying agree to this license
or go away") - then, from past experience in this process, the only
thing I can honestly say is: I *hope* so too.
If they ask me "what has changed between the last license draft and the
current one and why", then what can I say; I spent considerable time to
provide an (English and German) comparison of the two, but since no
information about the rationale has been forthcoming, should I invent
something just to hide the inadequacies of the process? They ask why we
need a new license at all; I try to explain, I translate RichardF's old
opengeodata.org posting; I translate the license itself...
I'm keeping the ugliest bits to myself; many things that have surfaced
on these lists and that are fuel for conspiracy theorists (process
behind closed doors, people on legal-talk being left out/ignored/not
answered to, no minutes of discussions with lawyers, OSMF board being
sidelined in the process, information actively withheld from public so
as not to stir debate, no explanation when/why which lawyers were
selected to work with us, WSGR/TWiki affair etc etc) have not been
discussed on the German lists and I have no intention of raising them.
The "use<->convey" blunder has been spotted and I have reassured people
that it is going to be fixed... but that is about as far as I can go in
glossing over the cracks without fearing for my place in heaven.
(Wait a minute... place already assigned to Fake SteveC? Well then...)
I'm sort of betting my own credibility vis-a-vis the German community on
the assumption that from now on we'll get the license process back on
the right tracks, properly talk to each other and work with each other
in a civilised way to arrive at something that works for most of us.
If an attempt should be made to once again disregard the community and
just forge ahead with the current draft, deciding stuff behind closed
doors and ignoring legitimate concerns just to meet some arbitrary
timeline, then I would probably have to say sorry to the German
community - sorry for being optimistic where skepticism would have been
in order; sorry for making you believe this was a community effort and
we were all in this together.
I hope it doesn't come to that.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the talk
mailing list