[OSM-talk] immutable=yes Fwd: DEC Lands

Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 12:42:34 GMT 2009


On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
<jukka.rahkonen at mmmtike.fi>wrote:

> Why not to store this kind of datasets as own layers in the database?  DEC
> data
> could be on its own, non-editable layer, but if there's something that
> people
> would like to edit those features could be copied or lifted to anothet, OSM
> layer.  That would make DEC updates easier as well, they would just update
> the
> DEC layer.  The same approach would suit other data of similar nature as
> well,
> like TIGER or cadastrial data.
>
>
+1

Having multiple separate "layers" in OSM would be good for various purposes.
The GPS traces "layer" is already one we use.


Eugene / seav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090314/f8b34338/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list