[OSM-talk] immutable=yes Fwd: DEC Lands
Eugene Alvin Villar
seav80 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 12:42:34 GMT 2009
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
<jukka.rahkonen at mmmtike.fi>wrote:
> Why not to store this kind of datasets as own layers in the database? DEC
> data
> could be on its own, non-editable layer, but if there's something that
> people
> would like to edit those features could be copied or lifted to anothet, OSM
> layer. That would make DEC updates easier as well, they would just update
> the
> DEC layer. The same approach would suit other data of similar nature as
> well,
> like TIGER or cadastrial data.
>
>
+1
Having multiple separate "layers" in OSM would be good for various purposes.
The GPS traces "layer" is already one we use.
Eugene / seav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090314/f8b34338/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list