[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Propoasl - RFC - Gym

[Guenther Meyer]

Am Montag 30 März 2009 schrieb Adrian Moisey:
> Hi
>
> >> > Someone else started a proposal for a gym, I need it in my area. So
> >> > I'm finishing it off:
> >> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gym
> >>
> >> Why not simply use:
> >>
> >> leisure=sports_centre
> >> sport=work_out (or gymnastics or ...)
> >>
> >> Regards, ULFL
> >
> > wh have a key for sports facilites, so why not sport=gym?
>
> There are no tags for 'sport=work-out' or 'sport=gym'.
> Also, a Gym isn't a sports_centre, its an actual building designed for
> Gymning.
>
right. so you have to create a new one.
as most gyms are not part of a sports centre, tagging leisure=sports_centre 
for every gym would be wrong.

a gym is used for physical workout, so sport is better suited than amenity.
sport=gym (only this, whithout leisure=...) says everything needed to 
basically describe and categorize this facilities, so it should be better 
than amenity=gym.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090330/49be5e6a/attachment.pgp>