[OSM-talk] Tagging dangerous areas

[Steve Chilton]

Indeed no harm done. But both Andy and I (independently) decided not to even go into the road, as others had apparently decided earlier! Discretion being definately the better part of valour in this case.
Incident noted at: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Steve%20Chilton/diary/3669
 
Cheers
STEVE

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org on behalf of Matt Amos 
	Sent: Mon 3/30/2009 6:33 PM 
	To: MP 
	Cc: Talk Openstreetmap 
	Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging dangerous areas
	
	

	On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:31 PM, MP <singularita at gmail.com> wrote:
	>> after the wembley mapping party last year i heard suggestions of a
	>> "locals=angry" tag. maybe we should expand that to include
	>> "locals=violent" or "locals=heavily_armed"?
	>
	> What happened at the Wembley mapping party?
	
	andy and steve independently attempted to map the same road on a
	council estate but both decided it might not be a wise idea. no
	violence was done i think, just evil stares.
	
	andy actually tagged it "locals=angsty", rather than "angry", but
	there is a precedent :-)
	
	http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/27794700
	
	cheers,
	
	matt
	
	_______________________________________________
	talk mailing list
	talk at openstreetmap.org
	http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk