[OSM-talk] turn restriction relations: via

[marcus.wolschon at googlemail.com]

On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:58:51 +0200, Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de>
wrote:

>> I realized that there is an ambiguity with the current (unordered
>> definition
>> of via) that cannot be solved : If the via includes a loop that must be
>> taken for the restriction to be applied.
> 
> Yes, I've thought about loops, too, and I have to agree that they are a
> possible situation where order would make a difference. I've yet to see
> any real-life examples, but nevertheless I don't really like this.

That issue gues away with API0.6 as relations become ordered.
Does it?
(I don't plan to support via)

Marcus