[OSM-talk] Illegal activity

[Russ Nelson]

Pieren writes:
 > Richard is convinced that the content of the photos is not protected
 > and I agree on that point. But he just decides to ignore all the
 > investments spent to rectify and georeference these photos on which
 > his derivative work is based. And this investment and work is
 > protected.

Richard isn't ignoring this.  The law ignores it.  Or do you think
there's case law which he hasn't cited?

-- 
--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241    
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog