[OSM-talk] shp-to-osm 0.7

Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatrails at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 13:08:22 GMT 2009


On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Emilie Laffray <emilie.laffray at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> 2009/11/4 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
>
>
>>
>> 2009/11/4 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also think that Frederik is right: it should be possible to assemble
>>>> different outer ways to one outer polygon and define it's meaning with tags
>>>> just on the relation
>>>>
>>>
>>> This *is* already possible - and also necessary for (at least!) any
>>> polygon with a geometry of more than 2000 points.
>>>
>>>
>> OK, everything is possible. Does this work in current renderers, namely
>> t at h? Mapnik has still problems with even most simple m-polygons (one
>> outer  and one inner closed way, tagged differently, no further tags on
>> multipolygon-relation).
>>
>
> Well in the case of multiple outers (all joined), multiple inners with tags
> on relation, Mapnik seems to be handling it fine.
>
>
So in otherwords, the 'outer' is not supposed to be tagged eithor? .. and
just tags on the relation?

Thanks,
Sam


> Emilie Laffray
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20091104/ce4a41a3/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list