[OSM-talk] Potlatch 1.3

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
>> Maybe "~= 100km", but "== 60 nm". 
> 
> Am I the only one who has read that as "60 nanometers"?

No, a certain Martin K. has already reported the same. I'd say it 
depends on context; nm is often, if sloppily, used in aviation at least, 
but since sub-meter precision isn't required there, nobody will misread it.

Bye
Frederik