[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maxheight:legal

[Aun Johnsen]

Ok, we are on it again, the previous vote (that approved maxheight:physical)
is way past, and some discussion have passed on maxheight:legal.

I think it is time to put the biasing from the previous proposal and vote
aside, and look on this with a clearer mind. In my opinion, the aproval of
maxheight:physical opens up for maxheight:legal, both of them with clear
names that can be used separately or together with maxheight, without
redefining maxheight. My recomendation is still to tag maxheight, even
together with maxheight:physical and maxheight:legal, but let these values
add more information about the restriction, and specially in countries where
both types exists side by side. There are countries around the world where
physical and legal restrictions have different signs, and even some places
where it is known to be placed physical obrstructions lower than legal
restrictions on roads.

The new proposal is located here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/maxheight:legal

Aun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20091129/86f49617/attachment.html>