[OSM-talk] Path vs footway vs cycleway vs...

[Cartinus]

On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote:
> 1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get
> global consistency, and that that's important;
> 2) people realise that editors can be used to avoid additional
> keystrokes and so there is actually no cost in adding foot=yes;

I've been told that when OSM started (I wasn't involved then) that every 
motorway had to be tagged horse=no+foot=no+bicycle=no.

There is a reason they stopped doing that.

-- 
m.v.g.,
Cartinus