[OSM-talk] bot vandalism
Apollinaris Schoell
aschoell at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 08:48:47 BST 2009
On 12 Oct 2009, at 24:05 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Apo,
>
> I don't know about the specific case you are talking about. But on
> a more general note, I am sure that we will be seeing stricter rules
> for bots, where instead of *politely asking* for things to be
> discussed before the bot runs & properly documented, we will in the
> future *demand* that this is the case and threaten to suspend bot
> accounts that don't play by the rules, and revert their edits.
>
this is exactly why I raised this again.
> I don't think that there will be an approval process for bots in the
> near future (simply because of the manpower required for such
> approval).
we need some process. doesn't have to be formal or same each time.
Just a minimum > 1 user to make such a risky thing like a bot. If a
bot user can't prove this was done and documented it will be blocked
on any user request without waiting for feedback to keep damage under
control.
I am sure there will be at least 5 volunteers to check the concept and
code for each bot if it's posted to talk. Still no guarantee but
fundamental bugs will be fixed before any big damage.
a second step must be a dry run with verification of the changes done.
>
> We might also ask bot users to flag the relevant accounts as "bot
> accounts", to allow easier filtering on the user side ("I am not
> interested in changes done by bots").
this should be a requirement. maybe we should even monitor accounts
for big edits across the planet in short time and block them
automatically if they are not approved bot accounts.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
More information about the talk
mailing list