[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (boundary=military)
Russ Nelson
nelson at crynwr.com
Fri Oct 16 01:18:49 BST 2009
Liz writes:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Russ Nelson wrote:
> > > or a simple reason why your tag is not good.
> >
> > Could you list some simple reasons, please? I don't understand what
> > you mean by "not good".
> simple example
> I tagged shop=lawyer
> On this list someone said that they didn't think that lawyer belonged in shop
> but office=legal.
I saw that. Simply because someone else offered a different idea
doesn't make your idea "not good". If I suggested that it should be
tagged "shop=office" AND "office=legal", would that be a better idea?
Neither one is documented in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=legal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=lawyer
(A note to anybody who thinks the wiki shouldn't be the be-all and
end-all: do you think that tags should all be documented? Do you
think they should be documented in one place? Then if not the wiki,
where?
--
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
More information about the talk
mailing list