[OSM-talk] Google Street View copyright question
David Muir Sharnoff
lists at dave.sharnoff.org
Wed Sep 9 16:36:54 BST 2009
Perhaps the OSM database should be moved out of the EU to a location
that doesn't suffer from a Database Rights law. Extracting from
no-EU data source by people not in the EU would then be okay for sure.
Extending the Database Rights law to extracting turn restrictions
from Streetview is a stretch anyway: they turn restrictions aren't
part of the original data.
-Dave
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Tom Hughes<tom at compton.nu> wrote:
> On 09/09/09 11:46, Roy Wallace wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Jonathan
>> Bennett<openstreetmap at jonno.cix.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a difference between using one fact from a newspaper article,
>>> and systematically extracting data from a database to reuse in another
>>> database.
>>
>> Is there a difference between
>> 1) using one fact from a newspaper article to use in another database, and
>> 2) using one fact from a database to use in another database?
>>
>> Can you clarify exactly what that difference is why one is legal while
>> the other is not (if that is indeed what you're implying)?
>
> Because (in the EU) Database Right kicks in and prohibits "substantial
> extraction".
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
> http://www.compton.nu/
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
More information about the talk
mailing list