[OSM-talk] how to map this? cycleway or footpath?
Shaun McDonald
shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk
Thu Sep 10 12:02:17 BST 2009
On 10 Sep 2009, at 11:21, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:05 PM, John Smith
> <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/9/10 James Livingston <doctau at mac.com>:
>>
>>> Because of the presence of the bicycle symbol on the ground, I'd say
>>> highway=cycleway;bicycle=designated;foot=yes. If that wasn't there,
>>> I'd say footway=yes;bicycle=yes
>>
>> Isn't that redundent?
>>
>> I assume highway=cycleway to imply bicycle=designated
>
> I'd use highway=path; bicycle=designated; foot=designated
> (foot=designated if you feel that the concrete on the left of the
> divider has been "specially designated" for pedestrians, otherwise I'd
> use foot=yes)
>
This isn't a highway=path since the surface is tarmac.
I'd say this should be highway=cycleway; foot=yes; cycleway=segregated.
Shaun
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2433 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090910/33535902/attachment.bin>
More information about the talk
mailing list