[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Additional parking types for amenity=parking

"Marc Schütz" schuetzm at gmx.net
Mon Sep 14 12:11:47 BST 2009


> > Since they're buildings wouldn't using a building=* tag be more
> > accurate in describing them?
> 
> Sure, they're buildings - but that just means a building tag should be
> used *in addition to* tags giving more details.

Not necessarily. If you only want to express the building type, building=garage(s) is sufficient. This usage is already described in the original building proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Building

Regards, Marc

-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser




More information about the talk mailing list