[OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?

[Peteris Krisjanis]

> Camp three: multiple ways representing paths of travel, grouped with a
> "bridge" relation to indicate they share a common bridge. This could
> probably be seen as a compromise, and is (I think) a good interim
> solution, if not a very-long-term solution.
>

I can suggest to add bridge's physical form to this. Otherwise yeah,
why not. It would also help to indicate where bridge actually starts
and ends to help routing software logic.

Cheers,
Peter.