[OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?

[Dave F.]

Anthony wrote:
>
>     Also, shouldn't the S.R.589 be a bridge directly below it label in
>     that image.
>
>
> I'm not sure what you're referring to there.  Can you give me a way ID 
> and a couple point IDs?
Sure:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=27.95915&mlon=-82.53835&zoom=16&layers=0B00FTF
The ways appear to clash on the same layer
>  
>
>     And the link to the North East, doesn't that pass over a river of
>     some sorts?
>
>
> Looking at the Yahoo Map which we are allowed to derive from, which 
> may be out of date, it seems to be some sort of man-made canal.  I 
> don't remember it, I don't have any pictures of it, and I'm not 100% 
> sure it wasn't filled in, so I'm not going to add it unless I can 
> manage to confirm it somehow.  It's difficult mapping without the 
> benefit of the Yahoo aerials, and these Yahoo aerials are all out of date.
>
> It's awesome having more up-to-date info than Yahoo and Google, 
> especially knowing you helped make it.
Definitely