[OSM-talk] OpenStreetView

[John McKerrell]

On 23 Sep 2009, at 20:16, malenki wrote:

> John McKerrell wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
>>
>>> | There was an error saving your changes
>>>
>> Odd, I'll take a look, can you paste the URL to the thumbnail to help
>> me identify it?
>
> Impossible at the moment, OSV looks like this both in opera and  
> firefox:
> http://omploader.org/vMmVxeA
>
I *think* that's how your own user homepage looks when you haven't  
uploaded any images, just click on the "OpenStreetView" on the top  
left to hit the real homepage (yes, this should be renamed).
>
>>> For moderating photos:
>>> 1) It would be handy to be able to see the pictures in full
>>> resolution since its a difference if a car with licence plate is
>>> photographed with
>>> a 320x240 cam of a mobile phone or with a 12MP SLR. The thumbnails
>>> aren't much helpful there.
>> Currently you see the image at max 1024 width/height,
>
> Yes, when I click "Mask", even if I don't know/am not sure if there  
> has
> to be something masked. Maybe it is an option to display one file  
> after
> another at 1024x? or to show thumbnails bigger as they are now.
>
rasher on IRC suggested this too so I'll probably go with it when I  
get time to do it, here's the mock-up he suggested, feel free to add  
your own suggestions:
	http://osm.jonash.dk/temp/osv-mock.png


>> that said, we will need to allow photos of GPSes to be uploaded when
>> we do server-side geotagging (i.e. uploading traces).
>
> Why is that? (maybe just because of my sometimes insufficient
> english..?)

Often it's a good idea to take a photo of your GPS so that you can  
accurately geotag your photos. It means that even if your camera time  
and your GPS time are out by a few seconds you can fix this by typing  
in the time shown in the photo. Actually this would probably be useful  
whether we're doing server-side geotagging or not.

John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090924/7497c1c2/attachment.html>