[OSM-talk] A plea for meaning ful changeset comments
Heiko Jacobs
heiko.jacobs at gmx.de
Sun Aug 1 11:19:07 BST 2010
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> It is so much easier to read a short
> phrase about an edit than having to look at the area and history of
> affected objects.
It sounds like a nice feature!
Anyone should code a possibility to comment changesets!
;-)
> One group ...
> The other group ...
You have forgotten the third group ... my group ... ;-)
I'm "grown up" as OSM Mapper using potlatch live edit.
And I still prefer it.
And you may edit live millions of nodes and ways without being
asked to comment a changeset.
So potlatch user may call comments a nice new feature, see above ;-)
I just searching around a little bit and, yeah, found a possibility
to give a comment to a live edit, too, but it is connected with
closing it. Because it is not necessary to close a changeset
if you end editing live (clicking in "View" for changing to the
slippy map works fine, too ;-) ) it might be, that this feature
is used seldomely (for examples: look at my changesets ;-) )
The number of commented changeset may arise if someone
changes potlatch, that the possibility of setting a comment
appears more visible and not only hidden behind a menu and
not only connected with closing it ...
Mueck
More information about the talk
mailing list