[OSM-talk] Wanted - spare CC-BY-SA account

Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
Tue Aug 10 14:44:23 BST 2010


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
> Am 10.08.2010 13:38, schrieb Ed Avis:
>> Frederik Ramm<frederik<at>  remote.org>  writes:
>>
>>> Because for us, your plannet import along with your steadfast refusal of the new
>>> license, only causes more work and more problems.
>>
>> That is true.  But then for those who would prefer to continue with CC-BY-SA,
> Didn't you read? There is no way in continuing with CC-BY-SA as CC-BY-SA  
> can't be used for databases. It is just not possible, damn!

In case i dont care and like PD more than CC-BY-SA or even worse the ODbl i would
be more than happy to continue with CC-BY-SA and accept it to fail in court,
basically putting the OSM Data into PD ...

All of this is unproven but i'd rather take that risk than to lock us into even
more legal binding documents which are unproven aswell.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100810/98b1eb22/attachment.pgp>


More information about the talk mailing list